which is faster 01' trans am WS6 or 01' camaro...

  • Thread starter Thread starter var_103
  • Start date Start date
V

var_103

...SS? i know there like practically the same car, but is one faster than the other or have more HP? qtr. mile, 0-60, topspeed etc..
asuming there bolth stock and manuals
hey chris WS6's have LS1's TOO
 
Q: How fast is my LT1 car?

A: Numbers are always different depending on who drove the car, how it was driven, the conditions of the track, how much weight was in the car, etc. And of course every car is not created equal. However these numbers, taken from the August '94 Chevy High Performance magazine, will give you an idea.

GM's advertised numbers are:

0-60 1/4 mileTop SpeedModel
------------------------- ----------------
6.114.8 @ 97 155 Z28 Coupe
6.3 14.8 @ 97 155 Trans Am Coupe M6
4.9 13.5 @ 104 160 Firehawk Coupe M6

*Q: How fast is my LS1 car?

A: Once again, each car will perform differently, however various magazines have tested the new cars, and came up with quarter mile times between 13.6 and 13.9 stock for 1/4 mile times, and top speeds between 160 for the Camaro to 162 for the Trans Am WS6.
 
the 01 camaro ss is definitly faster..
it laso contains the ls1 engine, which is one of the strongest and most capible engines out their.
you can pull much more power out of the ls1 than the ws6.
other than the engines they are practically the same.
same trans, same rear end, and same frame.
good luck bro!
 
I says it depends on the driver.
______________________________
 
They are equal because they are mechically identical. Even though the hp ratings change from year to year and different models they are all LS1's and make the same power. It comes down to the driver.
 
the 01 camaro ss is definitly faster..
it laso contains the ls1 engine, which is one of the strongest and most capible engines out their.
you can pull much more power out of the ls1 than the ws6.
other than the engines they are practically the same.
same trans, same rear end, and same frame.
good luck bro!

hahaha, nice post... Anyways, the LS1 is the engine in both cars... The WS6 is an option group on the T/A as is the SS to the Camaro... Both cars are Identical in ferformance specs if drivin by the same driver on the same day in the same elements of weather. One is not better than the other as of the 3rd and 4th Gen cars... The only time they had different specs was between 67 and 79. A little history for those that dont know, In 67 both the T/A and Camaro were powered by the same motor for the basic modle... The chev 350. Thats where the simularities ended. The z28 camaro for 67-69 had the underated 290 HP ZZ302, T/A had no such engine. 67-69 SS camaro had either a 350 HO or 396 turbo jet BB. The 396 was rated at 325-350-375 HP versions. The T/A had no such option. The COPO ( central office preduction order ) camaro had an Iron block version of the 427 BB turbo jet engine rated at 425HP. And then The Yenko S/C Camaro, it had the aluminum block 427 strait out of the Corvette rated at 475 HP. In the first Gen the Camaro was the definate dominator of the 2 cars. But in the 70's, the T/A came out ahead with the olds powered 455 BB and 400 small block which the Camaro did not offer in any year. In 1978 was the last year for the pontiac powered firebird, it was also the last year for the 400 SB. The olds 403 ( 185 HP ) versus the 400's 220 HP was available. Both engines were rated a 330 LB's of TQ. In 79, the 403 6.6 liter was the dominating motor of the 2 cars. In 1980-81 the Pontiac had the turbo T/A with a turbo 301 but that was scrapped. In 82 all T/A's and Camaro's were powered by the chevy motors and were therefore equal in performance. And that remained true untill 2002 when GM turned stupid and cut the production. ( expept for the SLP firehawk, it was faster than the SS Camaro but doesnt really count as they were bought from GM then done up as an aftermarket car ) I own a firehawk... Nice car...
 
hahaha, nice post... Anyways, the LS1 is the engine in both cars... The WS6 is an option group on the T/A as is the SS to the Camaro... Both cars are Identical in ferformance specs if drivin by the same driver on the same day in the same elements of weather. One is not better than the other as of the 3rd and 4th Gen cars... The only time they had different specs was between 67 and 79. A little history for those that dont know, In 67 both the T/A and Camaro were powered by the same motor for the basic modle... The chev 350. Thats where the simularities ended. The z28 camaro for 67-69 had the underated 290 HP ZZ302, T/A had no such engine. 67-69 SS camaro had either a 350 HO or 396 turbo jet BB. The 396 was rated at 325-350-375 HP versions. The T/A had no such option. The COPO ( central office preduction order ) camaro had an Iron block version of the 427 BB turbo jet engine rated at 425HP. And then The Yenko S/C Camaro, it had the aluminum block 427 strait out of the Corvette rated at 475 HP. In the first Gen the Camaro was the definate dominator of the 2 cars. But in the 70's, the T/A came out ahead with the olds powered 455 BB and 400 small block which the Camaro did not offer in any year. In 1978 was the last year for the pontiac powered firebird, it was also the last year for the 400 SB. The olds 403 ( 185 HP ) versus the 400's 220 HP was available. Both engines were rated a 330 LB's of TQ. In 79, the 403 6.6 liter was the dominating motor of the 2 cars. In 1980-81 the Pontiac had the turbo T/A with a turbo 301 but that was scrapped. In 82 all T/A's and Camaro's were powered by the chevy motors and were therefore equal in performance. And that remained true untill 2002 when GM turned stupid and cut the production. ( expept for the SLP firehawk, it was faster than the SS Camaro but doesnt really count as they were bought from GM then done up as an aftermarket car ) I own a firehawk... Nice car...
Not to chew up your history lesson but you have a few facts wrong ..
First the Pontiac Firebird and the camaro diden't share any engines until the late 70s when GM became more corperate to stay competitive in a global market ..there were No ZZ302 engines they were simply 302 engines The ZZ coding refers to a much later engine (a 350) in "Crate" form, and Chevrolet never refered to any engines in the 60s as "HO" that actually was a Pontiac term for the 326-350-400-455 engines through 74 in firebirds and T/As, the Pontiacs did have competitive engine packages back in the day .. the ram air II,III engines (400) were available in Firebirds as early as 67 and would give a 327-350 Camaro a run and even the 396 would have a hard time beating up a RA III,
The 67-69 cars (Firebirds) were available with Pontiac built 326,and later 350 and 400ci Pontiac built and designed engines, they even had their own 6cyl OHC engine until the 70 models , the Chevrolet counterparts had the 283, 327,350 and the 396 BB engines in the Camaros from 67-69..there were other "specail order" COPO cars but they were not mass produced
after that the 70-76 model firebirds had 350,400,455ci Pontiac built engines available, the 455 was discontinued in 76, the 350-400 in 79 replaced by a Pontiac built 301ci engine and the Olds 403ci engine was put in T/As after the run of 400 Pontiac engines ran out (so you could get either a 400 Pontiac OR a 403 Olds in 79 T/As) and was then replaced by a corperate 350-305 Chevrolet engine depending on where you lived ..
the 301 Pontiac was discontinued after 80 in both N/A and turbo Models
the late 70s were bad times at GM and after the 82 Models were introduced the "corperate" engine program took full effect and all Camaros and firebird models got the Chevrolet based 305-350 ci engines ..
If I remember correctly SOME Pontiac Cars exported to Canada in the 60s May Have had chevrolet engines installed but in the states they each had their own brand engine until the late 70s which is where you may be confused ...
______________________________
 
The ZZ302 was the engine put into the 67-69 Camaro Z28, My father has a Numbers matching 67 z28 one of 606 I believe, and he bought it new. I do know that between Canada and the US some cars were built differently as in Canada we have less restrictions on engines So I do believe the facts for the 3rd gen firebirds is 100% correct. ( in Canada anyways )
 
The ZZ302 was the engine put into the 67-69 Camaro Z28, My father has a Numbers matching 67 z28 one of 606 I believe, and he bought it new. I do know that between Canada and the US some cars were built differently as in Canada we have less restrictions on engines So I do believe the facts for the 3rd gen firebirds is 100% correct. ( in Canada anyways )
Actually what you are thinking of is the "DZ" engine code for the late 68-69 engines the 67-early68 Z/28 used a "MO" engine code for the 302,
Im not trying to argue I just Know the facts and like to make sure they are correct, for everyone to know , I have owned these cars when they were fairly new and have worked for GM for over 20 years
the ZZ series engines were later in the GM Crate engine program ZZ3 ETC..you can check the facts on Camarosource.ca your own Camaro resource in Canada if you doubt my accuracy ..:)
 
fair enough, I can admit if Im mistaken... Looks like your correct seeing as I just looked at his car... Thanks for your wisdome in this subject...
 
fair enough, I can admit if Im mistaken... Looks like your correct seeing as I just looked at his car... Thanks for your wisdome in this subject...
LOL .. NO problem diden't mean to ruffle any feathers but Im a stickler for information being correct especially when we have so many Younger people who don't know anything about the older cars ...I grew up with the muscle cars so I would like them to be able to have accurate info ...
PS.. im not allways right either :o
______________________________
 
Back
Top